Career Development

leader-member exchange theory Graphics courtesy of ToolsheroOpens in new window

One of the most important changes in organizations in the past decade or two is the role of the organization in its employees’ careers. It had gone from paternalism—in which the organization took nearly complete responsibility for managing its employees’ careers—to supporting individuals as they take personal responsibility for their future. And careers, themselves, have gone from a series of upward moves with increasing income, authority, status, and security to one in which people adapt quickly, learn continuously, and change their work identities.

This literature examines career development and management and its role in developing human potential.

Understanding Career Development and Management

Career development and management (or what is sometimes referred to as career planning) is an integral activity in our lives. There are three reasons why it is important to understand careers. First, if we know what to look forward to over the course of our careers, we can take a proactive approach to planning and managing them. Second, as managers (or other employees), we need to understand the experiences of our employees, fellow team members, and other colleagues as they pass through various stages of careers during their tenure in the same organization or over their life spans. Third, career development and management is good business. It makes good financial sense to have highly trained employees keep up with their fields so that organizations can protect valuable investments in human resources.

A career is a pattern of work-related experiences that spans the course of a person’s tenure in an organization or their life. The two elements in a career are the objective element and the subjective element. The objective element of the career is an observable, concrete environment. For example, you can manage a career by getting training to improve your skills. In contrast, the subjective element involves your perception of the situation. Rather than getting training (an objective element), you might change your aspirations (a subjective element). Thus, both objective events and the individual’s perception of those elements are important in defining a career.

Effective career development is integrated with the existing HRM functions and structures in the organization. Integrating career development with other HRM programs creates synergies in which all aspects of HRM reinforce one another. For example, in planning careers, employees need organizational information on strategic planning, HRM planning. Skills inventories can provide this information. Similarly, as they obtain information about themselves and use it in career planning, employees need to know the career paths within the organization and how management views their performance.

Career management is a lifelong process of learning about self, jobs, and organizations; setting personal career goals; development strategies for achieving the goals; and revising the goals based on work and life experiences.

Whose responsibility is career development and management? It is tempting to place the responsibility on individuals, and it is appropriate. However, it is also the organization’s duty to form partnerships with individuals in managing their careers. Careers are made up of exchanges between individuals and organizations. Inherent in these exchanges is the idea of reciprocity, or give and take.

The psychological contract between employees and workers has changed. Yesterday, employees “exchanged loyalty for job security.” Today, employees instead exchange performance for the sort of training and learning and development that will allow them to remain marketable. This, in turn, means that the somewhat unidirectional nature of HRM activities like selection and training is starting to change; in addition to serving the organization’s needs, these activities must now be designed so that the employees’ long-run interests are served, and that, in particular, the employee is encouraged to grow and realize her or his potential. Table X-1 summarizes how activities such as training and performance appraisal can be used to provide more of such a career planning and development focus (Otte and Hutcheson, 1992).

Table X-1. HRM Traditional versus Career-Development Focus
ActivityTraditional FocusCareer Development Focus
Human resource management planning
  • Analyzes jobs, skills, tasks—present and future.
  • Enhances projects needs.
  • Uses statistical data.
  • Adds information about individual interests, preferences, and the like to data.
Training and development
  • Provides opportunities for learning skills, information, and attitudes related to the job.
  • Provides career path information.
  • Adds individual growth orientation.
Recruitment and placement
  • Matching organization’s needs with qualified individuals.
  • Matches individual and jobs based on a number of variables including employee’s career interests.
Compensation and benefits
  • Rewards for time, productivity, talent, and so on.
  • Adds non-job-related activities to be rewarded, such as United Way leadership positions.

Like performance appraisal, training and development is an equally important element in managing organizational behavior and the enhancement of motivation and performance is the set of activities and processes that constitute career development and planning.

The Changing Business Landscape

Once upon a time, people graduated from school and eagerly sought employment with a large and prosperous organization. They considered themselves most fortunate if they were hired by a major and “secure” organization. They were able to assume that they would systematically move up in the organization, eventually retiring with a gold watch and a comfortable pension.

If the phase “once upon a time” sounds like a fairy tale, you understand why we use it. The lifetime employer with secure jobs is no longer a reality in the modern business environment. There are exceptions, of course, but by far the more realistic picture of a typical career today involves job changes, extensive organizational restructuring (often with job cuts) to respond to increased globalization and fiercer competition, and a greatly diminished sense of loyalty. Organizations seldom feel deeply obligated to provide long-term work, and employees rarely feel loyalty to the company. Part of the reason for these dramatic shifts is the nature of the business world. The age of technology and information has created a fluid and dynamic economy where organizations must make frequent and often radical changes to compete successfully. These changes have an impact on people. Some cannot adjust. Some lack skills to deal with a company’s changed mission. And some feel betrayed by “big business” when they are downsized or laid off.

Career planning used to involve assessing your personal goals and seeing how you could make these work with a current employer or a similar business. It used to involve seeing how to set goals that would help you be promoted in the organization. Even people who followed the advice of leadership gurus to develop a “vision” often did so within the context of existing organizations.

Advances in technology or what many refer as the Information Age has changed organizations and their people more dramatically than has any shift since the economy evolved from agricultural to industrial. At one time, the vast majority of Americans were employed in producing agricultural products. Today, less than 4 percent of the economy produces all the food we can eat. But the industrial revolution is also a thing of the past. Less than 20 percent of all workers are now employed in manufacturing. Some futurists predict that in the not-too-distant future, fewer than 10 percent of employees will produce all the manufactured goods we can use. So what will the other 85 percent of us be doing? We are, and increasingly will be, working with information.

Brain power has steadily replaced muscle power, machine power, and even electrical power. Management guru Peter Drucker (1998) says that the amount of labor needed to produce an additional unit of manufacturing output has fallen 1 percent per year since 1900 (99 percent), when machines took over what muscles once did. The years since World War II show similar drops in the amount of energy needed to increase manufacturing levels. What has taken the place of matter and energy is intelligence. Since 1900 the number of educated workers on the payroll has risen about the same rate. The major economic powers are no longer “the industrialized world,” but the knowledge world. Agriculture, construction, manufacturing, and mining employ fewer than 1 in 4 Americans, and even those people work principally with their hands rather than their backs and hands. We are all knowledge workers now, working for knowledge organizations. If all this is true, then what must employees and their organizations do to develop and manage careers in the new economy? Many of the concepts covered in the next literature will improve career development and management in any type of organization, including the knowledge businesses.

The followers’ influence upon a leader can enhance the leader or accentuate the leader’s shortcomings. Many of the competencies that are needed in leaders are the same qualities needed in effective followers.

In addition to possessing initiative, independence, commitment to common goals, and courage, a follower can provide enthusiastic support of a leader, but not to the extent that a follower fails to challenge a leader who is unethical or threatens the values or objectives of the organization.

Ineffective followers are as much to blame for poor performance, ethical and legal lapses within organizations, as are poor and unethical leaders. Followers have a responsibility to speak up when leaders do things wrong as this is a cornerstone of an effective leader-follower relationship and the relationship between a leader and their followers is critical in order for any goal to be obtained.

The Leader-Member Exchange Theory (LMX)

One theory that takes a look into this relationship is the leader-member exchange theory (LMX).

LMX focuses on the interactions between leaders and followers and understand that it is these interactions that are the center of the leadership process.

Under this theory, leaders differentiate their followers based on their perception of their follower’s competence/skills, trustworthiness, and motivation to assume greater responsibilities. Leaders then treat those with “high-LMX” differently than those with “low LMX.”

Those with “low-LMX” are more likely to be part of a transactional relationship with their leader. These types of interactions do not create a harmonious relationship between leaders and their followers. It is because of this that leaders are looking for followers that have “high-LMX.”

How does one find or foster followers with “high-LMX”?

One way is by using servant leadership. Servant leadership puts the emphasis on the needs of the followers.

If the needs of the followers are met then it is more likely that the relationship and interactions between leader and follower will produce an increase of LMX from the followers.

One could argue that any good leader is in turn a good follower. It has been suggested that every great leader had to be a great follower to succeed and that is what makes a great active follower (an active follower is described as a follower who is enthusiastic, intelligent, and self-reliant).

An active follower is self-managing, committed, competent, and courageous (remember our discussion earlier of the models, styles, or types of followersOpens in new window). Self-managing refers to being able to think critically and control their actions. Committed followers are committed to the goals of the teamOpens in new window and organizationOpens in new window.

Competent followers have the skills and knowledge that they need to accomplish the goal of the team and organization. Courageous followers are not afraid to stand up for their beliefs, even when they differ from the leaders.

A good leader knows the importance of followers that will stand up and have their voice heard even when the view is opposed to that of the leaders. However, if the leader exhibits a great deal of the dark side personality of narcissismOpens in new window they are likely to see courageous followers as insubordinate.

Interestingly enough, these traits could be applied to good leaders as well. In fact, the traits line up fairly well with Northouse’s five major leadership traits (e.g., determination, self-confidence, integrity, sociability, and intelligence in our text).

Leaders and followers share many of the same traits which calls into question such century old theories as the trait approach. Thus, if traits are shared between great leaders and followers then one might ask if the traits have more to do with great team building traits?

It has been said that “Effective followers and effective leaders are often the same people playing different parts at different hours of the day.” Perhaps the emphasis that LMX has is right.

That is, maybe the reason why leaders and followers with a “high-LMX” relationship work so well is because they are a cohesive team and the lines between leader and follower are narrower. So what is a leader without followers? Helen Keller once said, “Alone we can do so little; together we can do so much.”

So, what do leaders need from followers? And, what do followers need from their leaders?

  1. Wren, J. T. (2013). The leader’s companion: Insights on leadership through the ages. New York, NY: The Free Press.
  2. Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. N. (2015). Leader-member exchange theory. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. 13, 641-647. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.22010-2
  3. Bailery, C. (2013, September 2). Why every great leader is also a follower. Retrieved from http:///danblackonleadership.info/archives/3997
  4. Northouse, P. G. (2013). Leadership theory and practice (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA:SAGE.
  5. Suda, L. (2013). In praise of followers.Retrieved from https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/importance-of-effective-followers-5887.
Image